When AndCompta makes sense
You want a modern web experience, secure company-to-accounting-firm collaboration, reviewable automation and a full export that does not depend on an active subscription.
HermesG2 is a well-known local solution for Andorran general accounting. For teams familiar with its workflows and vendor support, continuity has real value.
| What is compared | AndCompta | HermesG2 |
|---|---|---|
| Andorran General Accounting Plan | yes | yes |
| Native IGI, not reconfigured VAT | yes | Check the requirements |
| IGI figures prepared for Form 900 | Partially | Check the requirements |
| Catalan as the language of the product | yes | Partially |
| Double entry accounting | yes | yes |
| Multi-client workspace for accounting firms | yes | Check the requirements |
| Bank-statement imports | yes | Check the requirements |
| Automated invoice capture | yes | Check the requirements |
| Assisted migration to an Andorran system | yes | Check the requirements |
| Full audit trail | yes | Check the requirements |
| Full export with supporting evidence | yes | Check the requirements |
Comparison reviewed on 2026-08-04. Other products change, so check their website before deciding.
Cells marked “Unverified” are features we have not confirmed directly in the product. We prefer leaving them blank to guessing.
You want a modern web experience, secure company-to-accounting-firm collaboration, reviewable automation and a full export that does not depend on an active subscription.
You already have processes, staff or an accounting firm trained on HermesG2 and the real cost of switching exceeds the benefit.
Accounting continuity matters more than the interface. Before switching, we reconcile the chart, journal, balances and open financial years against a real export, and keep the source available until the first close is validated.
What to ask them Request the journal, trial balance, master records, documents and attachments, open financial years and a backup in a recoverable format.
A person manually checked every row against the other tool’s public documentation; the review date appears at the top of the page. When we could not confirm a cell, it says “Unverified” instead of showing a cross.
We work this way because the usual industry comparison—a column of green ticks beside red crosses—is almost always a sign that nobody verified the claims. An honest gap tells you exactly what to ask the other provider before deciding.
If you find an error, send us the source and we will correct it with the correction date. We make corrections even when they make us look worse; a table updated only when it suits us is worthless.
Existing training is a real investment and may justify staying. We run the pilot with the people who close the financial year so they assess real tasks, not screenshots.
Because we have not been able to publicly confirm these features. The correct answer is to ask for a demo and a test export, not to fill in the table by intuition.
After reconciling the imported history, validating the open financial year and completing at least one close with the accounting firm. Until then, the source remains available in read-only mode.
Open an account, import three months of invoices and see whether the figures reconcile with what you expected. That is more reliable than any comparison table.